用过 Tamron AF28-75mm F/2.8 Di 的朋友请进

日番谷冬狮郎

最近想要入手Canon 24-70mm 2.8L, 发现同焦段的 Tamron AF28-75mm F/2.8 Di 评价也很高, 虽然还是不如Canon 24-70mm, 但是价格只是三分之一. 想问问用过的 Tamron 28-75 的朋友觉得用起来怎么样, 有片子的话也请发上来

How much?

How much?
buttonzhu 发表于 2010-8-5 14:21

Canon around $1700;
Tamron around $500;

Wow, that's huge difference.

These articles might be able to help u...
Generally speaking, Canon one is more faster and the quality is a bit higher.

TA
http://www.the-digital-picture.c ... Di-Lens-Review.aspx

http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/f ... ve.cfm/1128905.html

http://www.photographyreview.com ... 171808_3128crx.aspx

Thanks for the links. I've read some of the reviews. Seems that in terms of the image quality, Canon is marginally better. The huge price difference is not justifiable by that however. Canon will surely be a better build and faster but Tamron is a really close match in terms of optical performance such as sharpness and color, which are the key attributes of a lens. Given the price difference, Tamron seems to be a winner.

Wanted to see if anyone in the forum had real life experience using it and what are their thoughts on the lens.

500块钱的东西的评价或者成像能有1700的东西的效果好吗？

适马50 1.4 比佳能 50 1.4要好，这个是真的，但是两者价格……适马要比佳能贵……

24-70 2.8 建议回国买。国内的价格现在很划算。

500块钱的东西的评价或者成像能有1700的东西的效果好吗？

petertang 发表于 2010-8-5 22:55

Tamron surely can not out perform Canon but after burning $$$ for equipments for some time, I kinda figured that expensive Canon lenses may not always be a lot better than the cheaper third party lenses...

When Sigma 50mm 1.4 first come out, it was cheaper than Canon 50mm 1.4. Now price has increased because it's becoming famous that Sigma 50mm is better than Canon 50mm. Today, Sigma 50mm 1.4 is still cheaper than Canon 50mm 1.4, by just $2 (-__-) according to Camerasdirect's price.

一般我们去买高端设备不就是为了免去以后的升级的那种欲望嘛，老实说，升级是一种浪费的表现。所以，我还是推荐楼主买佳能的24-70

回复 8# petertang

这倒也是，呵呵