在city拍婚照被人赶。（已修改附加澳洲拍照条款）

What you said is very offensive, being a Christian and what you have done are totally seperate matter.

Photographing people on private property
There is no restriction on taking photographs of people on private property frompublic property. According to Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor (1937) there is no freedom from view, so people who are photographed on their property from a public location have no legal claim against you if what is captured in the photograph can be seen from the street. The same applies to photographs taken from private land when you have permission to take photographs. You should be careful that you are not being a nuisance and interfering with someone’s right to use and enjoy the land (see the case of Bathurst City Council v Saban (1985)).

Maybe on that day, you're being a nusiance and interfering with other's people right to use the space. If others have to pay for the space, then I think you should too, having a wedding doesnt mean others have to accomodate with you.

NNT 发表于 2012-6-11 09:34
What you said is very offensive, being a Christian and what you have done are totally seperate matte ...

抱歉抱歉。的确和基督没关系。。和教会人确认过了，教堂不是私有财产。

NNT 发表于 2012-6-11 09:34
What you said is very offensive, being a Christian and what you have done are totally seperate matte ...

在人行道上，没在教堂范围。纯粹遇到奇怪的人。

NNT 发表于 2012-6-11 09:34
What you said is very offensive, being a Christian and what you have done are totally seperate matte ...

不存在影响到任何东西，不过过激言论已经更改。感谢

既然没一个教堂门口都被赶，有可能是真的不能拍照吧？

doriszyf 发表于 2012-6-11 10:16
既然没一个教堂门口都被赶，有可能是真的不能拍照吧？

和教堂询问过了一下，不要站在台阶上就和他们没关系。不能进去。帖子也修改补充了下。基本是经济问题。

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5SDYwnZLdI

每次周末去UQ好多在UQ拍的

asdasd 发表于 2012-6-11 16:47

haha, 这个帅啊。

bluedream 发表于 2012-6-11 19:32
haha, 这个帅啊。

呵呵 要是这些boys去那个教堂，那就好玩了